Land Grab Strategies of the Globalists: Poisoning Land & Managed Retreat

Photo by Roger Starnes Sr on Unsplash

Land and asset theft comes disguised in many different ways. But one thing they always share is a globalist propaganda mask that says "it's for your own safety". Let's look at a couple of (not unconnected) examples from NZ: healthcare and aerial poisoning. And in my conclusion, I'll provide an example from the USA of a similar land grab tactic.

Once upon a time, in a rose-tinted world, I was convinced that in the main, healthcare administrators and 'leadership' worked hard to maintain high quality patient services at hospitals - they pushed against reluctant but mainly ethical funders. Doctors and nurses added muscle to the fight for justice: their patients' needs are escalating, and priorities change constantly... right? But the challenges conscientious staff have to face is not new: for decades (generations) hospitals have been run into the ground, resources unnecessarily wasted, corruption and conflicts of interest maintained and whistleblowers have repeatedly been ignored (or bullied). The results today, are worse than ever. WHY?

Looking at this problem with fully-opened post-covid eyes, provides a more logical answer: hospitals and clinics in rural New Zealand are being deliberately demolished. Yes, that is a difficult realisation. The hard-working staff (those who are strong enough and brave enough to persist) are swimming against the tide. The end is inevitable. The administration of these broken institutions have been set a goal that not everyone is aware of. One option is also the retirement villages selling the 'convenience' of Right to Occupy - owned by impact investment banks this is another method of 'keeping you safe'. Rural and coastal hospital patients suffering discrimination, eventually are forced to 'give up': they sell their properties and move to the city (maybe within those retirement villages) where the healthcare services are easily accessible, 'free', friendly, modern and more efficient. Auckland hospitals (private and public - they are combined) for example, have expanded to the tune of $100smillions and further land acquisition for expansion is now secured.

Of course, I don't need to tell you that Auckland is a designated SMART city.

Nature and our Health and Wellbeing

Those living in 'smart' cities like Auckland may not be aware that for over seventy years activists have tried raising awareness of the environmental and public health harms caused by aerial poisoning with 1080 (sodium monofluoroacetate). New Zealand's lands and waterways are NOT 'Clean, Green and 100% Pure' and (reflecting similar myths like those during the covid era) The Science™ behind any poisoning rationale does not stack up - even to superficial interrogation. The academics are captured. The propaganda that began 70 years ago "two weeks to flatten the curve" is startlingly similar to that applied unethically during covid by the Nudge Units, as I explain in these two articles:

There are no 'control areas/groups' for NZs aerial poisoning - over the decades virtually all of New Zealand (at one point or another) has been subjected to aerially-distributed poisoning(s). Record-keeping is deliberately confusing and poor quality. The poison of choice is often 1080. It's highly toxic and has no antidote. Conveniently, no valid tests exist in NZ for use in autopsies, so evidence that could lead to accountability for harms to 'non-target species' is absent. Sometimes brodifacoum is used (yes, even in residential areas). Combinations of poisons are also used, without any real knowledge of what those lethal cocktails may result in, or how to treat unintended consequences. Insurance? Ha ha! Liability in the land of one large group scheme with no proper risk assessment is also absent: “Even if they [NZ Gov] told us porkie pies, we would just suck it up.” Says QBE, professional indemnity insurance underwriters .

Last year, I reported (below) how the contractors making $millions from Kiwi taxpayers for Government poison operations were recently taken over by global chemical giant, Rentokil (But that doesn't prevent those same contractors to carry-out the deadly helicopter drops):

For those unfamiliar with the poisoners' rules, after an area (maybe hundreds of hectares) is aerially-poisoned, it officially becomes 'out of bounds' for the public. Of course enforcing that is impossible, but the toxicity of anything coming into contact with the poison is acute - until, apparently it is safely just 'washed away' by rain (similar to the way the 'virus' disappeared when you were eating at a restaurant or visiting the bathroom). Many people have suffered health problems (or worse) because of the indiscriminate way the poison is spread. Here's just one of thousands of case studies:

The timings of the land closures vary depending on arbitrary things like rainfall, temperature, geography or the decomposition rate of 'sample' rotting animal carcasses left on the poisoned land. Weeks, sometimes months, our forests are regularly closed to walkers, fishermen and hunters. The inevitable, lethal results of these poison operations are therefore largely undocumented.

Even before Agenda 2030 become more widely known, many of us suspected how the end-game of this aerial poisoning was actually a policy of longer-term exclusion from, and private ownership of, our natural, public lands. When peaceful protestors warning against the poisoning of land they relied upon for their food, water and income were repeatedly stigmatised, harassed, gaslit and even arrested, we realised this wasn't anything to do with 'saving wildlife'. The long history of New Zealand's capture by the chemical industry is a crucial backstory to the latest iteration of the 'environmental activism' we see in the propaganda today.

Over the decades, many books, films and artworks have been made, with the objective of raising awareness of the dangerous and unethical poisoning operations in NZ.

And this isn't just about New Zealand - it's global.

American forests under threat

What's happening now worldwide is the corporate take-over of previously public-owned entities. The non-profits, councils and government depts that were created specifically to AVOID the commercial exploitation of Mother Nature, have adopted that profit-driven model anyway. The laws have been changed - not to 'protect' the innocent, but to steal from them. From us.

The US Forest Service is undertaking a 'land grab' strategy. As More Than Just Parks reports today, Forest chiefs are manipulating management to give states control of national forests.

"Scott Fitzwilliams, who ran the White River National Forest for fifteen years before taking a buyout, called the plan a chaotic rewrite pushed through with no public process beyond the industry stakeholders who stood to benefit. The employees’ unions describe the leadership’s communication to the workforce as 'engineered vagueness'.”

And you and I both know what comes next. It's a 'done deal' and commercial exploitation is quickly installed.

I have more to write about these related 'land grab' topics. I want to share a new documentary about the 1080 poisoning of NZ (that I'm yet to watch). And I have evidence to share that lays out the corruption and systematic demolition of one of our healthcare institutions. Stay tuned.

Meanwhile, I'd like to remind readers of the Media Release from the People's Inquiry - a group of volunteers that documented hundreds of cases of environmental and human harm from NZs long-running obsession with chemical and poisons. There's an update coming on this topic too.

Nature and our Health and Wellbeing

American forests under threat

Sign up for Informed Heart