Continuing Global Harm: mRNA injections and Pregnant Women
UK based CAMP 3 News hosts Ant Critchley and Debi Evans streamed live on 7th May 2026 with special guests Sandi Adams and Cheryl Grainger. This article links up some of the UK legal issues trying to obtain the adverse event data for pregnant women, with the data that groups like NZDSOS seek from our authorities. A similar pattern in outcomes and behaviour, is emerging. Mistakes were NOT made.
My recent post about Prof Nikki Turner prompted lots of responses - online and off. Some were not publishable, readers are horrified. That's understandable. How do these kinds of academics, who have seen the reality of the harms their propaganda has done - continues to do - avoid any accountability? In fact, they get awards and are promoted? As I pointed out in my article about Turner, being such an explicit shill for BigPharma seems beyond belief with the enormous volume of scientific (and anecdotal) evidence countering their lies. But what's happening overseas?
UK MHRA tries to hide data of harms
In the UK, as Cheryl explains in her article, the regulator-turned-enabler MHRA revealed some important information about what they knew about adverse events, particularly those for pregnant women:
"Way back in 2022, Dame June Raine the now retired CEO of MHRA, did a presentation in Wales covering the 4 “pillars” of their safety monitoring. She mentioned that in the Yellow Card Vaccine MONITOR (YCVM), there were over 2,000 pregnant women and she was excited as this real-time data gave them a denominator, making the information more valuable."
In a report, the MHRA have since shockingly admitted that 'only' 1 in 7 of the UK 'monitor' that tracked all the participants (not just the pregnant women) suffered a 'serious adverse event'. This could mean death, a life-changing disability, a congenital problem or similar (1 min clip):
Cheryl provides all the details of what she termed this 'Misinformation Monitor' in her Substack articles Part 1 & Part 2 - with recent developments in this article.
In this 8 mins clip below from the Camp3 News, Cheryl summarises her ongoing legal quest (with others) to get to the truth of what the staff at the MHRA know about the pregnant women who not given voluntary informed consent and were coerced into having the mRNA injection(s):
Extract from Camp 3 News Livestream 07/05/2026
The evidence of harm is there, but struggles to get traction in any media outlet - even 'alternative' ones that we would expect to encourage these censored voices. The whole Camp3 episode is available here. Thank you Cheryl - and so many others - for the years of hard work, personal financial costs and emotional energy this bureaucracy and lawfare has demanded. I think many of us are determined NOT to let these people - like Dame June Raine (now ex-CEO) of the MHRA - get away with this crime against humanity. Even a child would be able to see the flaws in the 'research' MHRA presented. For example, here's just three examples that Cheryl points to:
They (MHRA) only monitored pregnant women for an average of 73 Days (5-244). 10 weeks only – a full pregnancy is 40 weeks. Why did they leave the Monitor?
Trimester information was missing and was not known in 762 (30%) of cases. Thalidomide showed its developmental effects if taken in the first trimester (day 34-50 after last period); the trimester is very important.
8 Congenital anomalies are recorded but there is no detail given.
New Zealand's Regulator Enabler : Medsafe
There are disturbing parallels between the strategies employed by the MHRA to withhold data about pregnant women and adverse events from the mRNA injections, and silence uncomfortable questions, and those used by New Zealand's regulator enabler, Medsafe. The captured academic institutions like the University of Auckland where Prof Nikki Turner is based, help maintain the 'safe and effective' narrative, as I explained in these three articles about the topic here, starting with the role legacy media had/has in the pro-jab campaign:
Ursula Edgington
Then there is the summary of the part Auckland University played:
Ursula Edgington
And an update of that missing data from the University of Auckland here:
Ursula Edgington
There are still individuals fighting for justice after they were mandated from their jobs in New Zealand - including UNPAID jobs. And as I wrote about here, the NZ Ministry of Education actually worked in secret behind the scenes with lawyers in the run-up to the 'no jab, no job' policy, to ensure that legal loopholes were deliberately exploited:
Ursula Edgington
There is evidence of similar strategies in other NZ Gov and commercial sectors, including dairy giant Fonterra, logistics giant Mainfreight, the cheap-as-chips retailer The Warehouse Group and electrical appliance manufacturer, Fisher & Paykel.
Ursula Edgington
Remember this was a policy that was established early-on in the covid era in Parliament, as illegal. For context about the adverse reporting systems here in New Zealand, particularly for my overseas readers, here is a clip from a recent event (March 2026) where Dr Alison Goodwin from NZDSOS explains the Kiwi 'misinformation monitor'...sounds familiar? (8 mins)
Of course there was no acknowledgement of these harms and the secrecy in the recent NZ Royal Commission of Covid Inquiry. However, many of us remain optimistic that there are people being called out, and will be held accountable for their actions during the covid era. Whether that will be anytime soon, remains to be seen. Meanwhile, we won't stop seeking truth, and justice for those who suffered, and continue to suffer, from the outcomes of this horrific propaganda campaign.
Thanks for your ongoing support, please share this article - all my work is public.